* Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> [130309 11:52]: > On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 00:01 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > However, going back to that MACH_NOKIA_RM696. If there exists only a > > select of this symbol and no "config MACH_NOKIA_RM696" entry, then the > > symbol will never be generated in the output .config file. > > > >[...] > > > > My conclusion is... it's a mess. > > That mess can only be fully cleaned up if the code for the RM-696 that > now is maintained in some unknown to me repository gets merged into > mainline, can't it? > > In the meantime, how do you prefer I solve the (trivial) issue of an > useless select for MACH_NOKIA_RM696? Drop that select or add an (equally > useless) config entry for MACH_NOKIA_RM696? Or should I try to ignore it > for the time being? Just adding the config MACH_NOKIA_RM696 to Kconfig as bool should fix this unless I'm missing something here. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
