On 03/08/2013 08:25 AM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: >> The content of the patches looks about right for me, however I would >> squash together the IP and platform driver patches so we avoid breakage >> within the series. Also I would put the patch for the .dtsi files as >> first one. >> > Looks ok to me too at quick look. Would it be possible to avoid possible > breakage if first patch is divided to omap-pcm.h change which come before > audio link driver changes and do omap-pcm.c change last? If we have them as separate we will have runtime regression between the patches. It is better to have them squashed together. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
