On 02/26/2013 09:47 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/26/2013 04:01 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> I was wondering if the level/edge settings for gpios is working on OMAP.
>>>
>>> I'm adding DT support for an SMSC911x ethernet chip connected to the
>>> GPMC for an OMAP3 SoC based board.
>>>
>>> In the smsc911x driver probe function (smsc911x_drv_probe() in
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c), a call to request_irq() with
>>> the flag IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW is needed because of the wiring on my board.
>>>
>>> Reading the gpio-omap.txt documentation it says that #interrupt-cells
>>> should be <2> and that a value of 8 is "active low level-sensitive".
>>>
>>> So I tried this:
>>>
>>> &gpmc {
>>> ethernet@5,0 {
>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> pinctrl-0 = <&smsc911x_pins>;
>>> compatible = "smsc,lan9221", "smsc,lan9115";
>>> reg = <5 0 0xff>; /* CS5 */
>>> interrupt-parent = <&gpio6>;
>>> interrupts = <16 8>; /* gpio line 176 */
>>> interrupt-names = "smsc911x irq";
>>> vmmc-supply = <&vddvario>;
>>> vmmc_aux-supply = <&vdd33a>;
>>> reg-io-width = <4>;
>>
>> By the way, reg-io-width for omap does not look correct. The GPMC only
>> supports 8-bit or 16-bit devices IIRC. I believe all my omap boards use
>> 16-bit.
>>
>
> I thought that even when the GPMC was a 16-bit external memory
> controller it could do some access adaptation to support 32-bit
> devices.
Right the GPMC itself may be able to translate 32-bit accesses into
16-bit. However, I have not looked at the data sheet for the smsc parts
to know what impact this would have on any register accesses in the smsc
device.
> By looking at the board files for others OMAP3 based boards
> (board-{omap3evm,overo,zoom-debugboard}.c) most of them set the struct
> omap_smsc911x_platform_data .flags member to SMSC911X_USE_32BIT.
I see this too now. I was looking at the
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smc91x.c which has SMC91X_USE_16BIT and
GPMC_CONFIG1_DEVICESIZE_16. So this is for a slightly different ethernet
chip but same concept. Hopefully, someone knew what they were doing for
those other boards!
> And by looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/smsc911x.txt I
> thought that the corresponding DT property for this flag was
> "reg-io-width"
>
> Anyway, I tried using both reg-io-width = <4> and reg-io-width = <2>.
> The ethernet chip works with both of them and I don't see too much
> difference in performance:
>
> 16-bit
> round-trip min/avg/max = 0.611/0.738/0.946 ms
>
> 32-bit
> round-trip min/avg/max = 0.519/0.690/0.976 ms
>
> So, is your call ;-)
While I can't argue with the fact it works, I would not be prepared to
make that call without reviewing the documentation for the smsc and the
driver.
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
