Hi Florian, On 02/26/2013 05:07 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/07/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 02/06/2013 02:30 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >>>> So a patch is being merged to handle triggers in the case of pwm >>>> leds [1]. >>>> When done, we will be able to add back the default trigger. Do you want >>>> to wait on it to merge this series? >>> >>> What kind of dependency do we have between these two series? I mean what >>> will happen if the DTS is merged before the pwm subsystem? >>> >>> If that does not generate any regression / crash, then it is OK, if not, >>> we should take care of the order. >> >> In this series the 'linux,default-trigger' property is not added to the >> pwm-leds node, so it is safe to take this series. >> I'm sure Florian will send the update to add this flag back for 3.10 >> or for >> 3.9-rc (the needed patches for PWM and leds-pwm will be in 3.9). >> > > Yes, it is safe to take this series. I will provide a patch to add back > the trigger when it is safe to. OK, great, I'll take the series then. Thanks, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
