"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@xxxxxx> writes: [...] >> IMO, this would be a much cleaner implementation if you just created a >> small driver for the wkup_m3. You're already doing a bunch of >> driver-like stuff for it (requesting base/IRQs, mapping regions, >> firmware, etc.) I think this should separated out into a real driver. >> Then it will be bound to the right omap_device, and normal PM operations >> will work as expected. >> >> Also, doing it this way will be more flexible for those wanting to use >> their own firmware on the M3, or customize the current firmware. > > Hmm... that definitely sounds more flexible. It should also help in the next SoC > AM437x which has a similar PM architecture. Where would you suggest placing > this minimal driver? For now, just leave it in mach-omap2 and we can figure out the right home for it eventually. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
