Hi Paul, > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:29 AM > To: J, KEERTHY > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Clock: Remove CK_* flags > > Hi Keerthy, > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, J, KEERTHY wrote: > > > > > Thanks for updating. Yes renaming the 'omap_clocks_register_links() > > > Is fine. I had blindly followed the hwmod function naming > convention. > > > The new name makes sense. > > > > OK great. BTW don't forget to cc the linux-arm-kernel mailing list > for > > all patches, otherwise we won't be able to merge the patches. Taking > care > > of it now in this case. > > Just noticed during final testing of this patch that it causes some > problems > with power management on OMAP4460: (see the suspend/resume messages) > I understand that retention is broken from the logs. I first tried seeing if the retention is working without the patch And I see that even without the patch retention fails. I am attaching the log. I just want to confirm if the retention is working fine without Applying the patch on mainline. Top Commit ID: 836dc9e3fbbab0c30aa6e664417225f5c1fb1c39 Defconfig: omap2plus_defconfig Am I missing something here? > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/jk_clock_flags_cleanup_3.9/201302071 > 83613/pm/4460pandaes/4460pandaes_log.txt > > Could you please take a look at this and see what happened? I suspect > that > I screwed something up as I was rebasing the patch. Unfortunately I > don't > have the time to debug it further. > > > - Paul Regards, Keerthy
Attachment:
Omap4460_Panda_log_without_CK__cleanup
Description: Omap4460_Panda_log_without_CK__cleanup
