Hi,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:38:16PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
> printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> index 4771945..fd6e35b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ void gpmc_onenand_init(struct omap_onenand_platform_data *_onenand_data)
>
> if (cpu_is_omap24xx() &&
> (gpmc_onenand_data->flags & ONENAND_SYNC_READWRITE)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Onenand using only SYNC_READ on 24xx\n");
> + dev_warn(dev, "OneNAND using only SYNC_READ on 24xx\n");
it would seem more natural to use dev_err() instead.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
