* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [130124 23:54]: > On Thursday 24 January 2013 11:52 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:49:47PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>When applying RT patch on top of Linux, spinlocks are > >>implemented as RT-mutexes, which means they are preemptable. > >> > >>Current GIC implementation on OMAP is using a spinlock > >>to protect against preemption. As it turns out, we need > >>to convert that lock into a raw_spinlock so that OMAP's > >>interrupt controller works as expected after RT-patch > >>is applied. > >> > >>This patch is simply to decrease the amount of changes > >>RT-team needs to carry out of tree. It doesn't cause any > >>changes in behavior. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > Sorry i missed this patch. Tony can you please > pick it up? > > For the patch, > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > Looks like no comments, so applying this into omap-for-v3.9/fixes-non-critical. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
