On Wednesday 30 January 2013 04:42 AM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU name : OMAP4470 ES1.0 HS
Sigh. No. Look at what you're doing - look carefully at the above.
"CPU implementer" - 0x41. That's A. For ARM Ltd. ARM Ltd implemented
this CPU. Did ARM Ltd really implement OMAP4470 ? I think TI would be
very upset if that were to be the case.
Yes, it would be very surprisingly :)
So no, OMAP4470 is _NOT_ a CPU. It is a SoC. The CPU inside the SoC is
a collection of ARM Ltd Cortex A9 _CPUs_.
See? Please, learn what a CPU is as opposed to a SoC.
Completely agree with you. I will fix this
Thank god you agreed to drop your current approach. Please elaborate
what you are going to fix and also state what user-space features
changes from OMAP4460 to OMAP4470.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html