On 01/17/2013 10:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> I just wonder how this is going to work with DT... You are not going to have >> the ability to use callback in this form. >> I think the GPIO handling should be done in the driver itself rather than in >> the board file. > > that can (should ?) be moved to ti-st eventually. In fact I don't know > why it was removed in the first place, we would need Pavan to help us > with that query. Yes, this is a good question. I don't know what is the spacial thing platforms need to do in the callback.. > Still, for -rc, the minimal patch had to be cooked, right ? Sure it need to be fixed. I would try to revert the patch which caused the issue (eccf2979 drivers/misc/ti-st: remove gpio handling). Should fix the legacy boot, but it is going to be even bigger fun to move to DT (and get rid of the callbacks). I don't have anything against this patch as such. Just wanted to point out the obvious that the comfort of callbacks are not going to be around in some cases. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
