* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [130107 12:24]: > * Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130105 21:29]: > > Various drivers use omap_dma_filter_fn() but don't depend on DMA_OMAP. > > This is fine because there is a trivial inline definition in case > > DMA_OMAP is disabled... until the caller is built-in and DMA_OMAP=m. > > > > I tried adding the rather weird 'select DMA_OMAP if DMA_OMAP!=n' to > > these drivers' kconfig symbols to promote it to built-in if necessary. > > This sort of works but kconfig complains about the circular dependency > > and it becomes impossible to disable DMA_OMAP in the 'make nconfig' > > menu. So that's not the right thing to do. > > > > Any ideas? > > Hmm let's ask Russell and Vinod what they are envisioning. I believe > there was some talk about removing the filter functions? > > For the short term fix, how about ifdef out the DMA usage in the > client drivers: > > #if defined(CONFIG_DMA_OMAP_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_MMC_OMAP_MODULE) > ... > #endif Sorry this should have been: #if defined(CONFIG_DMA_OMAP_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_MMC_OMAP) ... #endif Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
