Hi Paul,
On 12/09/2012 02:03 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> There's no need to determine the current power state for powerdomains
> that must be on while the kernel is running. We mark these
> powerdomains with a new flag, PWRDM_ACTIVE_WITH_KERNEL. Any
> powerdomain marked with that flag is reported as being in the ON power
> state while the kernel is running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 9 ++++++---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains2xxx_data.c | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains33xx_data.c | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains3xxx_data.c | 9 ++++++---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains44xx_data.c | 5 ++++-
> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains44xx_data.c
> index 704664c..b64213c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains44xx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains44xx_data.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static struct powerdomain core_44xx_pwrdm = {
> [3] = PWRSTS_ON, /* ducati_l2ram */
> [4] = PWRSTS_ON, /* ducati_unicache */
> },
> - .flags = PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE,
> + .flags = (PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE |
> + PWRDM_ACTIVE_WITH_KERNEL),
> };
My understanding is that for OMAP4 devices, the core power domain may
not be active the same time as the MPU power domain. The Cortex-A9 has
the ability to access some peripherals (such as timer, McBSP) via a
private bus that does not require the core domain to be active. This is
a difference from OMAP3 devices, where the core would always be on with
the MPU power domain.
Hopefully, Benoit will chime in if I have gotten this wrong ;-)
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
