Hi, +Sricharan who commited that On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is > >> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless > >> it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference, > >> but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly > >> implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here. > > > > This is exactly what I had to revert (as I mentioned in the other email, > > I had to revert the other patches otherwise compilation would break): > > > > 0e8e5c34 "regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings" > > e76ab829 "regulator: twl: Remove references to the twl4030 regulator" > > 029dd3ce "regulator: twl: Remove another unused variable warning" > > Yeah. 32k clock is not provided by twl. > > As I said I need to take a look at CCF to see if it already there. If it is > clock driver + mapping + patch for wl12xx should fix the issue you are facing. > > > Let me know if you need more info. > > BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg > added there: > f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls. > > Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured. anything essential you can list ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
