On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Florian, the fbdev maintainer, has been very busy lately, so I offered to send
> the pull request for fbdev for this merge window.
Pulled. However, with this I get the Kconfig question
OMAP2+ Display Subsystem support (OMAP2_DSS) [N/m/y/?] (NEW)
which doesn't make a whole lot of sense on x86-64, unless there's
something about OMAP2 that I don't know.
So I'd suggest making that OMAP2_DSS be dependent on OMAP2. Or at
least ARM. Because showing it to anybody else seems insane.
Same goes for FB_OMAP2 for that matter. I realize that it's likely
nice to get compile testing for this on x86-64 too, but if that's the
intent, we need to think about it some more. I don't think it's good
to ask actual normal users questions like this just for compile
coverage.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
