Paul, -resending in plain text only, sorry about that- On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Use the functional power states as the API to control power domains: > > - use the PWRDM_FUNC_PWRST_* macros for the power states and logic > settings, > > - the function pwrdm_set_next_fpwrst(), which controls the power domains > next power and logic settings, shall be used instead of > pwrdm_set_next_pwrst() to program the power domains next states, > > - the function pwrdm_set_fpwrst(), which programs the power domains > power and logic settings, shall be used instead of > omap_set_pwrdm_state(). > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx> > [paul@xxxxxxxxx: split the original patch into OMAP2/3/4 variants; > clean up omap3_save_secure_ram_context(); fix commit message; > warn if sets fail; various other changes] There are a lot of 'XXX' comments, can this be fixed by a proper comment? Regards, Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
