Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap_vout: remove cpu_is_* uses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [121129 01:37]:
> Hi Tomi,
> 
> On Thursday 29 November 2012 11:30:28 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 2012-11-28 17:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 12 November 2012 15:33:38 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> 
> > >> This patch removes use of cpu_is_* funcs from omap_vout, and uses
> > >> omapdss's version instead. The other patch removes an unneeded plat/dma.h
> > >> include.
> > >> 
> > >> These are based on current omapdss master branch, which has the omapdss
> > >> version code. The omapdss version code is queued for v3.8. I'm not sure
> > >> which is the best way to handle these patches due to the dependency to
> > >> omapdss. The easiest option is to merge these for 3.9.
> > >> 
> > >> There's still the OMAP DMA use in omap_vout_vrfb.c, which is the last
> > >> OMAP dependency in the omap_vout driver. I'm not going to touch that, as
> > >> it doesn't look as trivial as this cpu_is_* removal, and I don't have
> > >> much knowledge of the omap_vout driver.
> > >> 
> > >> Compiled, but not tested.
> > > 
> > > Tested on a Beagleboard-xM.
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > The patches depend on unmerged OMAP DSS patches. Would you like to push
> > > this series through linuxtv or through your DSS tree ? The later might be
> > > easier, depending on when the required DSS patches will hit mainline.
> > 
> > The DSS patches will be merged for 3.8. I can take this via the omapdss
> > tree, as there probably won't be any conflicts with other v4l2 stuff.
> > 
> > Or, we can just delay these until 3.9. These patches remove omap
> > platform dependencies, helping the effort to get common ARM kernel.
> > However, as there's still the VRFB code in the omap_vout driver, the
> > dependency remains. Thus, in way, these patches alone don't help
> > anything, and we could delay these for 3.9 and hope that
> > omap_vout_vrfb.c gets converted also for that merge window.
> 
> OK, I'll queue them for v3.9 then.

Please rather queue the cpu_is_omap removal to v3.8 so I can
remove plat/cpu.h for omap2+.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux