hi, On 11/26/2012 11:30 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > The difference here is that the LED, backlight, etc are all different > physical devices begin driven by the pwm pin, so it makes sense to have a > device tree node for them, while using the pwm as gpio is just a different > function of the same physical pin. So in a sense the pwm controller also > becomes a gpio controller. I like the idea of the pwm core automatically > instantiating a pwm-gpo device if it sees a gpio-controller property in the > pwm device devicetree node. OK, fair enough. I will go with the plan I described in the first mail for the GPIO use of PWM. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
