On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou [snip] > My intention wasn't never to make overlays overly portable. My intention > was to make them in a way that portability can be introduced if the boards > are 'close' enough, but not for arbitrary boards. > > There have to be compatible interfaces both on the base, and the overlay > dtbs. Right. And this is why I'm arguing that those interfaces should be described explicitly - using existing OF mechanisms like interrupt-map where possible, rather than having a very general, but very low-level interface to make arbitrary changes to the DT. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
