On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote: > I was wondering that, because exposing a pin to control the whole PMIC > low power mode seems to be something that should be generic enough to be > handled by the regulator framework. Having something that's controlled by software is really not at all generic - suspending a PMIC from a GPIO is generally tied in very closely with the CPU power sequencing which means it's typically some combination of very hard coded things that we can't control or part of much wider control of sequencing. > In the current situation we do have a pwr_en pin that can be controlled > by a GPIO or whatever signal from the SoC. > That's very similar, at PMIC level, to the fixedregulator that allow a > GPIO binding to enable it. > Don't you think that should deserve a support in the fmwk? I'm not seeing a coherent description of a feature here - what exactly are you proposing that we do? When and how would this GPIO be set for example?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
