On 11/08/12 21:16, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/08/2012 12:59 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 00:24:23, Hunter, Jon wrote: >>> >>> On 11/08/2012 01:59 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> There is no reliable way to determine which source should be used in runtime >>>> for boards that do not have the 32k oscillator wired. >>> >>> So thinking about this some more and given that we are moving away from >>> board files, if a board does not provide a 32kHz clock source, then this >>> should be reflected in the device-tree source file for that board. >>> Hence, at boot time we should be able to determine if a 32kHz clock >>> source can be used. >>> >> >> Let me feed some more thoughts here :) >> >> The way it is being detected currently is based on timer idle status bit. >> I am worried that, this is the only option we have. > > Why not use device-tree to indicate the presence of a 32k clock source? > This seems like a board level configuration and so device-tree seems to > be the perfect place for this IMO. Well, that is what my commit message says... -- Regards, Igor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
