On 10/15/2012 09:39 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:43 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:05:01AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:25 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>>> For DT bindings, I think the binding itself shouldn't change based on my >>>>> work but I would like these same bindings to help build the DMA engine >>>>> code mappings. >>>>> >>>>> Now would it make sense to NOT merge these changes for 3.7 and postpone >>>>> to 3.8. I can host these patches on a topic branch and merge them when >>>>> we are ready. I plan to spend some good amount of time on my work this >>>>> week so we should be ready pretty soon. >>>>> One these changes are merged, users can start moving to this scheme. >>>> >>>> I just wanted to see how things are progressing your side. Did you >>>> create a topic branch for this? If so let me know where I can find it, I >>>> did not find a branch on your infradead git tree. >>>> >>>> I wanted to pull in the latest patches for some testing. >>> Sorry for delay, I had everything ready, but couldn't manage to commit >>> and push. I have pushed to topic/dmaengine_dt, it is pushing out now... >>> >> Vinod, >> >> Looks it seemed 3.7-rc1. Does that mean we have to wait for 3.8, or >> will it show on later -rc for 3.7? > Yes this will be merged once we work out the common interface, otherwise > we will end up redoing interfaces for all drivers. Hi Vinod, A few people have been asking me if getting device-tree support for DMA engine is plan for record for v3.8. I know that you were working through implementing a common interface and so I wanted to check how that is going. Do you have any insight to when device-tree support may get added? Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
