On 11/08/2012 11:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> [121108 09:21]:
>>
>> On 11/07/2012 05:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>> That's a bugger. I completely missed your patch last week sorry (I will blame the Danish
>> beer) and had clearly not folded in to my testing!
>
> :)
>
>>> I guess we should apply the following fix somewhere or
>>> do we need to check other places too?
>>
>> I will re-test your master branch today and put it through my dmtimer tests to double check.
>> However, in general I did ensure that we checked pdata was not NULL before accessing when
>> I introduced the dt stuff. In my changelog [1] I had ...
>>
>> "5. When device-tree is present the platform_data structure will be NULL and so check for
>> this."
>>
>> I just need to make sure that get_context_loss_count() is not called before checking it is
>> populated.
>
> OK
>
>
>>> +
>>> + if (pdata) {
>>> + timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>>
>> You don't need this it is already handled a few lines before.
>>
>>> + timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>>
>> We could probably move this too. For example ...
>
> OK yeah makes sense to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> index 38c12ef..9dca23e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> @@ -799,12 +799,11 @@ static int __devinit omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> timer->id = pdev->id;
>> timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>> timer->reserved = omap_dm_timer_reserved_systimer(timer->id);
>> + timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>> }
>>
>> timer->irq = irq->start;
>> timer->pdev = pdev;
>> - timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>> - timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>>
>> /* Skip pm_runtime_enable for OMAP1 */
>> if (!(timer->capability & OMAP_TIMER_NEEDS_RESET)) {
I have tested the dmtimers with this on the 3430-beagle and 4430-panda
with and without device tree and is working fine.
Do you want to generate the patch or me?
Cheers
Jon
>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135065877008624&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
