Hi Grant On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou > <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [ snip ] > > g. Since we've started talking about longer term goals, and the versioning provision seems to stand, I hope we address how much the fragment versioning thing is similar to the way board revisions progress. If a versioning syntax is available then one could create a single DT file for a bunch of 'almost' similar board and board revisions. Using a single DTB in the same manner you have a single uImage would make some people quite happy, since you won't have to do any bootloader magic to make sure you pass the correct DTB for the specific revision. Regards -- Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
