* Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [121102 03:05]: > Hi Santosh, > > I believe the change from cpu_is_xxx() to soc_is_xxx() just for OMAP5 > leads to unnecessary confusion, even though soc_is_ is more technically > correct. All of them will be eventually soc_is_xxx() and private to arch/arm/mach-omap2. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
