On Sunday 04 November 2012 08:56 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 21:33:47, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
[...]
+static int omap2_mbox_fifo_needs_flush(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
+{
+ struct omap_mbox2_fifo *fifo =
+ &((struct omap_mbox2_priv *)mbox->priv)->tx_fifo;
type casting is generally avoided in linux code.
I was just trying to be consistent with the rest of the mailbox FIFO
related code :)
Will see how to get rid of these globally in the next version.
+ return mbox_read_reg(fifo->msg_stat);
+}
+
+static mbox_msg_t omap2_mbox_fifo_readback(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
+{
+ struct omap_mbox2_fifo *fifo =
+ &((struct omap_mbox2_priv *)mbox->priv)->tx_fifo;
+ return (mbox_msg_t) mbox_read_reg(fifo->msg);
same here.
Ok.
+}
+
/* Mailbox IRQ handle functions */
static void omap2_mbox_enable_irq(struct omap_mbox *mbox,
omap_mbox_type_t irq)
@@ -205,19 +219,21 @@ static void omap2_mbox_restore_ctx(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
}
static struct omap_mbox_ops omap2_mbox_ops = {
- .type = OMAP_MBOX_TYPE2,
- .startup = omap2_mbox_startup,
- .shutdown = omap2_mbox_shutdown,
- .fifo_read = omap2_mbox_fifo_read,
- .fifo_write = omap2_mbox_fifo_write,
- .fifo_empty = omap2_mbox_fifo_empty,
- .fifo_full = omap2_mbox_fifo_full,
- .enable_irq = omap2_mbox_enable_irq,
- .disable_irq = omap2_mbox_disable_irq,
- .ack_irq = omap2_mbox_ack_irq,
- .is_irq = omap2_mbox_is_irq,
- .save_ctx = omap2_mbox_save_ctx,
- .restore_ctx = omap2_mbox_restore_ctx,
+ .type = OMAP_MBOX_TYPE2,
+ .startup = omap2_mbox_startup,
+ .shutdown = omap2_mbox_shutdown,
+ .fifo_read = omap2_mbox_fifo_read,
+ .fifo_write = omap2_mbox_fifo_write,
+ .fifo_empty = omap2_mbox_fifo_empty,
+ .fifo_full = omap2_mbox_fifo_full,
+ .fifo_needs_flush = omap2_mbox_fifo_needs_flush,
+ .fifo_readback = omap2_mbox_fifo_readback,
+ .enable_irq = omap2_mbox_enable_irq,
+ .disable_irq = omap2_mbox_disable_irq,
+ .ack_irq = omap2_mbox_ack_irq,
+ .is_irq = omap2_mbox_is_irq,
+ .save_ctx = omap2_mbox_save_ctx,
+ .restore_ctx = omap2_mbox_restore_ctx,
You should do the indentation fix in another patch.
Ok will split it up.
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
index cc3921e..e136529 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct omap_mbox_ops {
void (*fifo_write)(struct omap_mbox *mbox, mbox_msg_t msg);
int (*fifo_empty)(struct omap_mbox *mbox);
int (*fifo_full)(struct omap_mbox *mbox);
+ int (*fifo_needs_flush)(struct omap_mbox *mbox);
+ mbox_msg_t (*fifo_readback)(struct omap_mbox *mbox);
Do you think passing the msg structure as an argument and letting the
function populate it will be better instead of returning the msg
structure ? No strong opinion since from read_foo() point of view
what you have done might be right thing. In either case, please
get rid of typecasting.
Passing the msg structure looks fine. Will do that in the next version.
OK
Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
