Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:12:12PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jean Pihet wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Do you have CPU_IDLE enabled?
> > >> FYI the issue is not present with CPU_IDLE enabled.
> > >
> > > Hmm, how can you tell?  I thought you weren't able to reproduce it with
> > > CPU_IDLE disabled either?
> > I could not reproduce the issue, with and without CPU_IDLE enabled.
> > What puzzles me is that the PM QoS code only has influence on the
> > states chosen by cpuidle, so the change should not have any impact
> > with CPU_IDLE enabled. I reallt need to reproduce the issue.
> > Let me try with the same setup as yours (bootloader images,
> > omap2pus_defconfig, angstrom roots).
> 
> I just sent a patch to fix a bug I found on OMAP4 panda but while
> reading this thread again, I think it could be that it's the same bug
> which is just easier to reproduce on Paul's setup.
> 
> Paul, Aaro, can you see if [1] makes the problem go away ? that would be
> another reason to push [1] during this -rc cycle.
> 
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135115602407925&w=2

ping

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux