Hi, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:12:12PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Do you have CPU_IDLE enabled? > > >> FYI the issue is not present with CPU_IDLE enabled. > > > > > > Hmm, how can you tell? I thought you weren't able to reproduce it with > > > CPU_IDLE disabled either? > > I could not reproduce the issue, with and without CPU_IDLE enabled. > > What puzzles me is that the PM QoS code only has influence on the > > states chosen by cpuidle, so the change should not have any impact > > with CPU_IDLE enabled. I reallt need to reproduce the issue. > > Let me try with the same setup as yours (bootloader images, > > omap2pus_defconfig, angstrom roots). > > I just sent a patch to fix a bug I found on OMAP4 panda but while > reading this thread again, I think it could be that it's the same bug > which is just easier to reproduce on Paul's setup. > > Paul, Aaro, can you see if [1] makes the problem go away ? that would be > another reason to push [1] during this -rc cycle. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135115602407925&w=2 ping -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
