* Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [121025 12:32]: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > I wonder if we can now with multiple watchdogs supported to > > have also PRM/CM implement omap_prcm_wdt_ioctl() that just > > handles WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS and then just remove that handling > > from the other omap watchdog drivers? > > The watchdog ioctl code needs access to internal watchdog state and > functions, for example WDIOC_KEEPALIVE and WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT. How would > the approach you're thinking of implement those operations? I have not looked how the watchdog subsystem handles multiple watchdogs, but.. Can't we have the omap watchdog and twl watchdog return -ENOTSUPP for WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS and have the watchdog core fail over to the third wathcdog omap_prcm_wdt_ioctl() that only implements WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS? Or something like that. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
