Hi Omar,
On 9/26/2012 3:21 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On 12 September 2012 19:08, Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
Patch: arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes, was Acked by Benoit
however it seems it wasn't picked up, so resend.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg69121.html
Patch: OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support, there wasn't an
opposition other than to cleanup the driver too, however I got
quite some patches to send before continuing the cleanup.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg69338.html
Omar Ramirez Luna (2):
OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support
arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/mailbox.txt | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi | 5 +++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 5 +++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 5 +++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 3 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c | 12 ++++++++++++
6 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/mailbox.txt
Ping. I'm in the understanding that these go through your tree, am I right?
Since it is too late for 3.7, you should probably do two more things:
- move the mailbox driver outside mach-omap2
- move the nr_mbox information in the driver as well instead of the
hwmod for the DT boot.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
