On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote: > > Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is > > observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to > > resume even though it is not suspended before. > > > > Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@xxxxxx> > > FWIW: > > Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > Paul does this fix the issue for you ? Note that it depends on a > previous patch Sourav sent [1] > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=134796819607889&w=2 Yes, thanks - that fixes it, Tested-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> > There's one thing that gets my attention, though, why only n800 would > fail here ? > > I wonder if we should be using: > > pm_runtime_set_active(dev); > pm_runtime_get_enable(dev); > > to prevent our runtime_resume() to be called from probe, but Sourav > tested and it doesn't work on BeagleBoard, but it works on PandaBoard. > > Does it ring any bell ?? Nothing off the top of my head but haven't looked into it -- maybe this rings a bell with Kevin? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
