* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120911 03:54]: > Hi Tony, > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:40:34, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this > > we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to > > deal with the timings yet. > > > > Then once the minimal devicetree binding is in place, we can > > call the current GPMC timing functions using the compatible flags > > and auxdata in the gpmc.c driver. > > > > That way we get all the legacy boards booting with GPMC support > > for smsc911x etc, and can even remove some less used board-*.c > > files. > > Thanks. I agree with your suggestion and would be proceeding so > as to achieve minimal devicetree support. > > And a newer version of this series has been posted. OK great! > > Then we just add the generic GPMC timings when we're happy with > > those. > > Meanwhile can you send me the gpmc debug logs for n800 where tusb > patch on generic timing was causing the hang along with logs > without the culprit tusb patch so that we could arrive at generic > gpmc timings. Yes sorry been meaning to do that but keep getting distracted continuously somehow.. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
