Hi, On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:04:15PM +0000, B, Ravi wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:51:04PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:39:47PM +0530, Ravi Babu wrote: > > > >> From: Santhapuri, Damodar <damodar.santhapuri@xxxxxx> > > > >> > > > >> AM335x uses NOP transceiver driver and need to enable > > builtin PHY > > > >> by writing into usb_ctrl register available in system control > > > >> module register space. This is being added at musb glue driver > > > >> layer untill a separate system control module driver is > > available. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta <ajay.gupta@xxxxxx> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Santhapuri, Damodar <damodar.santhapuri@xxxxxx> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Babu <ravibabu@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Kishon, you were adding a real phy driver for OMAP's internal phy > > > > logic on one of your patches and I believe this will > > conflict with > > > > your changes, right ? > > > > > > Indeed. My final patch of that series removes some of the functions > > > from omap_phy_internal.c (which was taken care in the phy driver). > > > > > > > > How does this look to you ? Is this at least correct ? I > > suppose the > > > > correct way would be to actually have the system control module > > > > driver which we have been waiting, right ? > > > > > > Correct. I think once we have the system control module driver in > > > place, we'll have everything wrt control module register writes > > > implemented in correct way. > > > > So $SUBJECT will pretty much be thrown away once we have SCM > > driver, in that case it's best to wait a bit longer and apply > > this series once SCM driver is available and after your > > series too... you agree ? > > > > Felipe, I am sure there are patches in this series[0/13], which are > not dependent on this patch or control module, Can we pull in those > patches (all dual instances support patches)? So that I can re-work > and submit again? sure, will do, don't worry :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
