Hi Vaibhav, On 09/04/2012 05:42 AM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > On 9/3/2012 8:16 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> The overall series looks good to me, but I do have a couple of comments. >> >> On 08/29/2012 03:31 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> The McBSP IP within OMAP2420 and 2430 is different we need to create separate >>> dtsi files for them. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2420.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2430.dtsi | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2420.dtsi >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2430.dtsi >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2420.dtsi >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..f375c68 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2420.dtsi >>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ >>> +/* >>> + * Device Tree Source for OMAP2420 SoC >>> + * >>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ >> >> Nit: 2012 >> >>> + * >>> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License >>> + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any >>> + * kind, whether express or implied. >>> + */ >>> + >>> +/include/ "omap2.dtsi" >>> + >>> +/ { >>> + compatible = "ti,omap2420", "ti,omap2"; >>> + >>> + ocp { >>> + mcbsp1: mcbsp@48074000 { >>> + compatible = "ti,omap2420-mcbsp"; >>> + reg = <0x48074000 0xff>; >>> + reg-names = "mpu"; >>> + interrupts = <0 59 0x4>, /* TX interrupt */ >>> + <0 60 0x4>; /* RX interrupt */ >> >> That one is not correct because it does comply with the interrupt >> controller specifier that require only one cell: >> >> intc: interrupt-controller@48200000 { >> compatible = "ti,omap2-intc"; >> interrupt-controller; >> #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> ... >> >> The one you are using is for GIC IRQ controller. >> It works probably because we are using hwmod so far :-) >> > > I think now we should kill the resource overwrite path, and should > respect and use resources passed from DT. > > Benoit, > Did you get a chance to validate patch submitted towards this?? Not yet, but we discussed that with Peter and since he does have these patches for DT, he'll be able to test your series with the McBSP changes. I still want to update a couple of DTS to test that on some other IPs. Regards, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
