On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 13:12:17, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 09/04/2012 08:14 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:12:04, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> On 09/03/2012 01:52 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote: > >>> Adopt pinctrl support to c_can driver based on c_can device > >>> pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to d_can mode > >>> according to definitions provided in .dts file. > >>> > >>> In device specific device tree file 'pinctrl-names = "default";' > >>> and 'pinctrl-0 = <&d_can1_pins>;' needs to add to configure pins > >>> from c_can driver. d_can1_pins node contains the pinmux/config > >>> details of d_can L/H pins. > >> > >> Looks good, is the pinctrl property documented in the dt bindings already? > >> > > > > Yes, its here Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.txt > > Sorry, I meant not the generic pinctrl, but the c_can/d_can bindings > documentation (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/). > No, I have not included because those are pinctrl driver specific bindings. If the SoC supports pinmux/conf feature then those should be added according to pinctrl driver. If the SoC is not supported pinmux/config then this configuration is not required. Thanks AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
