On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> index d7f55e4..a3831a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> @@ -3156,6 +3156,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = {
> CLK(NULL, "dss_tv_clk", &dss_tv_clk, CK_443X),
> CLK(NULL, "dss_48mhz_clk", &dss_48mhz_clk, CK_443X),
> CLK(NULL, "dss_dss_clk", &dss_dss_clk, CK_443X),
> + CLK(NULL, "dss_fck", &dss_fck, CK_443X),
> CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", &dss_fck, CK_443X),
Is it right to re-use dss_fck for the "ick" here? I think it is due
to omap4 modulemode stuff but I don't have DM in front of me and
wanted a double-check...
Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
