* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [120821 11:09]: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:05:15PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 08/21/2012 10:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > This isn't the general view for the regualtor API - we generally > > > want all regulators to be registered in order to allow us to see > > > what's going on with things even if we've not figured them out from > > > software. > > > Oh, I said the above specifically because when I added the LDO > > configuration for the regulators that weren't used to the Tegra .dts > > files, you told me to remove it, based on the comment I put in there > > that they weren't used on the board. > > The board shouldn't have to define the regulators, the regulator driver > really ought to be able to figure out that they're there by itself if > there's no configuration based purely on knowing which chip is there. > From that point of view it's OK for the chip .dtsi to have them (though > ideally the driver wouldn't *need* that either) which was what was > happening here. So I assume no changes needed here then? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
