Hi, On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:16 -0400, Raphael Assenat wrote: > On our AM3505 based board, dpi.c complains that there is no VDSS_DSI regulator > and the framebuffer cannot be enabled. However, this check does not seem to > apply to AM3505/17 chips. > > Taking into account comments received after my first patch[1], I have added > entries to dss_features.c to support the am35xx soc. Then in dpi.c, instead > of using cpu_is_omap34xx() and soc_is_am35xx(), a call to dss_has_feature() > is used. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=134272967203409&w=2 > > Signed-off-by: Raphaël Assénat <raph@xxxxxx> Chandrabhanu has posted a series that removes a bunch of cpu_is checks from omapdss. On of them is the use of VDDS_DSI in dpi.c. Can you wait until I've merged those patches to omapdss master branch (probably a few days), and then create a new patch that adds AM35xx to dss_features? Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
