HI, Sergei.
On 07/25/2012 04:39 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
>
>> OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
>> omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
>
>> TODO: add support for other omap versions
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> index 40373db..8018cad 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> [...]
>> @@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
>> u32 val = 0;
>>
>> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>
> Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
Good point.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
