Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce power domains functional states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2012 08:31 AM, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
>>
>> my Crib about the above apis are lack of logic power state handling:(
>> which forces code like cpuidle to use different apis for logic
>> power state and force them to use these apis just for pwrst.
>
>
> Have you looked at an alternate approach that was proposed here..
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1160431/
>
Santosh pointed me to the thread offline. This is indeed a much better
approach IMHO than having 3 conflicting options inside powerdomain
framework.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux