Re: [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:41:31PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx>
> 
> The OMAP3530 is based upon the same silicon as the OMAP3430 and so the I2C
> revision is the same for 3430 and 3530. However, the OMAP3630 device has the
> same I2C revision as OMAP4. Correct the revision definition to reflect this.
> 
> This patch is based on work done by Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx>
> Changes from his patch
> - Update OMAP_I2C_REV_ON_3430 also to reflect that it is same as 3530
> 
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>

Applied to next, thanks.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux