* Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120710 01:35]: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 13:48:52, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > No thanks.. We don't want to make it 32 bit and bloat all the compiled in > > clock even further. > > > > In that case, how about just get rid of cpu_mask completely and trust the > data passed by clock-tree for clksel dividers? > Let clock-tree data handle this, even if in some cases we end up in > duplicating data for some clocks?? Yes something like that. We already know which clocks need to be registered, so whatever we still use CK_XXXX for should be also initialized in omapxxxx_clk_init() functions. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html