> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Venu Byravarasu
> <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >
> > Should it not be CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead of just CONFIG_PM?
>
> Why? I think we should have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP only when we have
> *suspend*, *resume* hooks. But this driver has only *runtime_suspend*
> and *runtime_resume* hooks.
Yes, you are right. CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not needed for runtime.
> >
> >> > +
> >> > +static int omap_usb2_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> >> > + struct omap_usb *phy = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > +
> >
> >
> >> > +static int __init usb2_omap_init(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + return platform_driver_register(&omap_usb2_driver);
> >> > +}
> >> > +arch_initcall(usb2_omap_init);
> >> > +
> >> > +static void __exit usb2_omap_exit(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + platform_driver_unregister(&omap_usb2_driver);
> >> > +}
> >> > +module_exit(usb2_omap_exit);
> >> > +
> >
> > Do you really need arch_initcall here?
> > If not, then you can replace above two function calls with
> module_platform_driver().
>
> I indeed want it to be arch_initcall. When the module is built-in, I
> want this module to loaded before twl6030-usb.c
Should be fine.
> Thanks
> Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
