On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Xiao Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2012/7/6 Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> On 07/06/2012 05:38 AM, jgq516@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > From: Xiao Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Since more and more arm chips support device tree, it'd be better add >> > PROC_DEVICETREE >> > in arch/arm/Kconfig to avoid duplicate code. >> >> I think this should remain user choice. If its going to be selected, >> then you might as well just remove the option altogether. Perhaps just >> make the option default to yes. >> > Hmm, sounds reasonable from your point. So the better choice is to set the > option default to Y if the board has dt support just like tegra_defconfig > and at91_dt_defconfig, right? thanks. Why bother? If the defconfigs select it then most users basing their config from that will be just fine. PROC_DEVICETREE is 100% optional, it's useful to get runtime access to the contents of the device tree but it's not required for the kernel to boot. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
