Hi Rob, Grant,
Benoit suggested that I ask your opinion on the below.
Basically, I am trying to understand if there is any reason not to
enable OF_DYNAMIC. More details below on the exact scenario I am trying
to solve. OF_DYNAMIC seems to provide a good solution for me.
Thanks
Jon
On 06/21/2012 06:50 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2012 02:15 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am in the process of adding a device-tree binding for OMAP timers and
>> I have encountered a scenario where ideally it would be useful to remove
>> a device-tree node at runtime.
>>
>> The scenario is this ...
>>
>> 1. OMAP3 devices may or may not have security features enabled. Security
>> enabled devices are known as high-secure (HS) and devices without
>> security are known as general purpose (GP).
>> 2. For OMAP3 devices there are 12 general purpose timers available.
>> 3. On secure devices the 12th timer is reserved for secure usage and so
>> cannot be used by the kernel, where as for a GP device it is available.
>> 4. We can detect the OMAP device type, secure or GP, at runtime via an
>> on-chip register.
>> 5. Today, when not using DT, we do not register the 12th timer as a linux
>> device if the device is secure.
>>
>> When migrating the timers to DT, I need a way to prevent this 12th timer
>> from being registered as a device on a secure device. The options I have
>> considered are ...
>>
>> a. Have separate a omap3.dtsi for GP and secure devices or place the
>> node for the 12th timer in a omap3-gp.dtsi that is only used for
>> boards with GP devices. The downside of this is that for boards
>> that can support GP and secure device (such as the omap3 SDP) we
>> require a separate dtb blob.
>>
>> b. Remove the timer node dynamically at runtime using the
>> of_node_detach() API. In this solution we define a "ti,timer-secure"
>> property that the 12th timer on omap3 devices would have and at
>> runtime if we are a secure omap3 device, we search the timer nodes
>> for any nodes with this property and remove them.
>>
>> Option B, seems to be the better option but requires me to enable
>> CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC for all omap devices and I was not sure if there is any
>> downside to doing so. Enabling this feature does not seem to add much code
>> as far as I can tell, however, I wanted to get some feedback before
>> proposing this. Also if there are any other options I should consider then
>> please let me know.
>>
>> For option B, the timer node would look like ...
>>
>> + timer12: timer@48304000 {
>> + compatible = "ti,omap3-timer";
>> + ti,hwmods = "timer12";
>> + ti,timer-alwon;
>> + ti,timer-secure;
>> + };
>>
>> I would then add the following function to the omap timer code to search
>> for any timers with the "ti,timer-secure" on a secure device and enable
>> the OF_DYNAMIC option. Right now it is only timer 12 on OMAP3 that
>> requires this, but I have made the function generic so that it could
>> handle other devices (but none exist today that I am aware of).
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
>> index 8c22a8e..5e38946 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/mach/time.h>
>> #include <plat/dmtimer.h>
>> @@ -482,6 +483,35 @@ static int __init omap2_dm_timer_init(void)
>> }
>> arch_initcall(omap2_dm_timer_init);
>>
>> +static struct of_device_id omap3_timer_match[] __initdata = {
>> + { .compatible = "ti,omap3-timer", },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * omap_dmtimer_init - initialisation function when device tree is used
>> + *
>> + * For secure OMAP3 devices, timers with property "ti,timer-secure" cannot
>> + * be used by the kernel as they are reserved. Therefore, to prevent the
>> + * kernel registering these devices remove them dynamically from the device
>> + * tree on boot.
>> + */
>> +void __init omap_dmtimer_init(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* If we are a secure device, remove any secure timer nodes */
>> + if ((omap_type() == OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)) {
>
> Oops! Bug in the above code. Meant to be ...
>
> if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
>> + for_each_matching_node(np, omap3_timer_match) {
>> + if (of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-secure", NULL))
>> + of_detach_node(np);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
