On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 20:44 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > I won't press further with my Utopian ideas, but I think we need to > segregate 5V/HPD enabling from PHY enabling somehow. Because that is > already failing slow but otherwise perfectly legit displays (like > Andy's "HPD taking 700ms" TV) Yes, I agree. That's what the four power states I suggested in the other mail were about. The second power state would have HPD enabled, and the third would enable the PHY. Or at least enough to do i2c transfers, I'm not sure if the PHY is needed for that. > > And also, as I said earlier, if you keep it enabled all the time, it'll > > eat power even if the user is never going to use HDMI. > > > > On a desktop I guess the power consumption wouldn't be an issue, but I > > do feel a bit uneasy about it on an embedded device. > > > As I said, it should be platform dependent. If a device doesn't have > HDMI port, the board file would not even have platform_enable. And if Not that it's relevant here, but I have a patch series where I remove the platform_enable stuff for HDMI, and move the work to the hdmi driver. That needs to be done for device tree stuff, when we don't have board files. > it has, some user action should enable it while 'making the device > ready for new display'. > IOW, how do you envision an OMAP4 based tablet with HDMI port react to > display connections ? I guess this was covered in my mail about the phone's HDMI. If the tablet is unlocked, and I plug in a HDMI cable, I expect the device to do something. Either clone the display, or perhaps ask me what I want to do. So yes, HPD would be always enabled, when the tablet is active (unlocked). > >> HDMI enable/disable via /sysfs/ and HPD (de)assertion, switch only > >> HDMI_PHY on/off. > >> The user selecting "Autodetect and Configure" option would then equate > >> to "(un)loading" of the HDMI driver. > > > > HDMI cannot be currently compiled as a separate module. Although I think > > you can detach a device and a driver, achieving the same. Is that what > > you meant with unloading? > > > Yeah, I meant something to the effect of bringing HDMI driver to life. > > > > By the way, when the device is in system suspend, we surely won't detect > > the HPD even if we kept the HPD always enabled. So there we'll miss the > > HPD interrupt anyway, and the EDID cache would be invalid. > > > If omapdss already handles the possibility of display changed during > suspend, I think we should be good :) Hmm I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I was referring to your patch, which invalidated the EDID cache only on HPD interrupt when the cable is unplugged. And we'd miss that interrupt when the board is in system suspend, even if we otherwise kept the HPD interrupt always enabled. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
