* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120627 06:44]: > * Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120614 07:37]: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 18:52:54, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > > As omap1 and omap2 will never be compiled together, due to > > > different compiler flags, so we can simply make > > > cpu_class_is_omap2() = true, for all non-omap1 platforms. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 3 +-- > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Tony, > > > > Ping??? > > Thanks applying into devel-am33xx branch. Actually looks like this fails for the dynamic detection case with omap1_defconfig.. Looks like you did not build test your patch with omap1_defconfig? Please do it for every patch! It seems we need something better though for multi zImage too, we can't really rely on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1 or CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS here to determine anything. Anyways, dropping this for now, let's try to come up with something better. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
