Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> writes: [...] > Keshava is reverting a fix for a HW errata. I can't accept it as it will > cause regressions. Granted, regression by regression, there's no change, > but I simply can't knowingly cause a regression to the driver just to > have PM working. We need a real fix for this issue. Sure, as long as there is a fix in this -rc cycle. This driver intoduced changes in v3.5 that break PM for the whole SoC (by preventing CORE retention.) These changes were clearly not tested with PM. If you cannot fix this during the -rc cycle, then you need to revert the driver PM changes that broke PM for the *whole* SoC. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
