On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:24:10 +0530 "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti"
<tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 May 2012 17:30:48 -0700 Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Grant,
> >>
> >> Here's the final round of GPIO cleanups for v3.5. This branch is based
> >> on my for_3.5/fixes/gpio branch you just pulled.
> >>
> >> Kevin
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it was this series or the following cleanups which broke
> > things for me, but I've been trying 3.5-rc2 on my GTA04 and the serial
> > console (ttyO2) dies as soon as the omap-gpio driver initialises.
> >
> > After some digging I came up with this patch to gpio-omap.c
> >
> > @@ -1124,6 +1124,9 @@ static int __devinit omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
> >
> > + if (bank->get_context_loss_count)
> > + bank->context_loss_count =
> > + bank->get_context_loss_count(bank->dev);
> > pm_runtime_enable(bank->dev);
> > pm_runtime_irq_safe(bank->dev);
> > pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> >
> > which fixes it.
> >
> > What was happening was that when omap_gpio_probe calls pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > it calls
> > _od_runtime_resume -> pm_generic_runtime_resume -> omap_gpio_runtime_resume
> > -> omap_gpio_restore_context
> >
> > and then the serial port stops.
> > I reasoned that the context probably hadn't been set up yet, so restoring
> > from it broke things.
> > Initialising bank->context_loss_count seems sensible and would ensure that
> > we didn't try to restore the context until it has actually been lost.
>
> I thought the following code exactly does that. That is context_lost_cnt_after
> would be zero until there is context loss. The bank->context_loss_count is zero
> at the beginning. So, (context_lost_cnt_after != bank->context_loss_count) would
> be false and hence context restore should NOT happen? Not sure if I am
> over looking
> anything here....
>
> omap_gpio_runtime_resume(...)
> {
> ...
> if (bank->get_context_loss_count) {
> context_lost_cnt_after =
> bank->get_context_loss_count(bank->dev);
> if (context_lost_cnt_after != bank->context_loss_count) {
> omap_gpio_restore_context(bank);
> } else {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> return 0;
> }
> }
> ...
> }
Hi,
I've looked more closely at this now.
The problem is that the initial context loss count is *not* zero. Not always.
The context loss count is the sum of
count = pwrdm->state_counter[PWRDM_POWER_OFF];
count += pwrdm->ret_logic_off_counter;
for (i = 0; i < pwrdm->banks; i++)
count += pwrdm->ret_mem_off_counter[i];
(from pwrdm_get_context_loss_count()).
These are initlialised in _pwrdm_register
/* Initialize the powerdomain's state counter */
for (i = 0; i < PWRDM_MAX_PWRSTS; i++)
pwrdm->state_counter[i] = 0;
pwrdm->ret_logic_off_counter = 0;
for (i = 0; i < pwrdm->banks; i++)
pwrdm->ret_mem_off_counter[i] = 0;
pwrdm_wait_transition(pwrdm);
pwrdm->state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(pwrdm);
pwrdm->state_counter[pwrdm->state] = 1;
What I'm seeing is that for wkup_pwrdm and dpll{3,4,5}_pwrdm,
the state that pwrdm_read_pwrst returns is PWRDM_POWER_OFF.
So that state_counter gets initialised to '1', and so the initial
context_loss_count, which includes that counter, is also '1'.
I think it is the wkup_pwrdm that covers the GPIOs that are causing problems
for me.
So either there is something seriously wrong with pwrdm_read_pwrst and it
shouldn't be reporting that the wkup_pwrdm is off, or we need to initialise
bank->context_loss_count like my patch does.
NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
