Re: [PATCHv8 13/13] I2C: OMAP: simplify omap_i2c_ack_stat()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> >> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> >>
> >> stat & BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1),
> >
> > Not true. I'd guess you are missing some context in the patch
> > description.
> 
> 
> See the explanation , hope I understood your concern correctly.
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg70277.html

The code may be right, but as Russell pointed out, the patch description
is very weak. I could read the mail now to understand, but I prefer to
wait for a better patch description. Because I need to ensure other
people reading the git history later will understand easily without
having to search the web.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux