On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 23:36:58, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > > Leaving HWMOD data patch aside, both the above patches should be > > considered for acceptance, can you please review the same and if there > > are no review comments, can it be merged? > > I don't quite understand the part about leaving the hwmod data patch > aside. Is that one not ready? Or does it need to be modified pending > some other series? > It is ready, since I did not get your acked-by or reviewed-by on the patche- series, so I wanted to get trivial patches merged. Paul, I would really recommend you to look at the proposal of getting the clock- tree and hwmod patches to the linux-next until merge window, so that it will get tested for some time. Also, I am in the process of converting to common-clock framework on top of Rajendra's patch-series. Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
