* Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120609 08:00]: > Newly added AM33XX device falls under omap2 class, so > make cpu_class_is_omap2() true for AM33XX > (Add soc_is_am33xx() check). > > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h > index 14f050f..5e36564 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h > @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) > #define cpu_class_is_omap1() (cpu_is_omap7xx() || cpu_is_omap15xx() || \ > cpu_is_omap16xx()) > #define cpu_class_is_omap2() (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx() || \ > - cpu_is_omap44xx()) > + cpu_is_omap44xx() || soc_is_am33xx()) > > /* Various silicon revisions for omap2 */ > #define OMAP242X_CLASS 0x24200024 I think this can be now simply !cpu_class_is_omap1() as there is a very slim chance that we'll ever be compiling omap1 and omap2+ together because of the different compiler flags needed. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
